Effect of perioperative flurbiprofen axetil on long-term survival of patients with esophageal carcinoma who underwent thoracoscopic esophagectomy: A retrospective study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have an anti-inflammatory response, but it remains unclear whether the perioperative use of flurbiprofen axetil can influence postoperative tumor recurrence and survival in esophageal carcinoma. We aimed to explore the effect of perioperative intravenous flurbiprofen axetil on recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with esophageal carcinoma who underwent thoracoscopic esophagectomy. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients who underwent surgery for esophageal carcinoma between December 2009 and May 2015 at the Department of Thoracic Surgery, Anhui Provincial Hospital. Patients were categorized into a non-NSAIDs group (did not receive flurbiprofen axetil), single-dose NSAIDs group (received a single dose of flurbiprofen axetil intravenously), and multiple-dose NSAIDs group (received multiple doses of flurbiprofen). RESULTS: A total of 847 eligible patients were enrolled. Univariable and multivariable analyses revealed that the intraoperative use of flurbiprofen was associated with long-term RFS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.56, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.42-0.76, p = .001) and prolonged OS (HR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.38-0.63, p = .001). CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative flurbiprofen axetil therapy may be associated with prolonged RFS and OS in patients with esophageal carcinoma undergoing thoracoscopic esophagectomy.

Successful Sleeve Resection as a Marker for Proficiency for Robotic Pulmonary Resection.

BACKGROUND: Robot technology is a revolutionary technique to overcome limitations of minimal invasive surgery. The proficiency level varies from study to study. We considered the first sleeve lobectomy as a benchmark procedure to evaluate the proficiency level. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 197 patients who underwent robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) for primary lung cancer between December 2011 and May 2018. Patients were divided into two groups based on undergoing surgery earlier period (EP) or later period (LP) than the first sleeve lobectomy by RATS (May 25, 2015). The preoperative, operative, and short- and long-term postoperative outcomes were compared. Seven-year survival was also compared between two periods for T1N0 and T2N0 diseases. RESULTS: Preoperative features were similar. The mean operative time was 166.8 ± 55.1 and 142.4 ± 43.9 minutes in EP and LP, respectively (p = 0.005). The mean number of dissected lymph nodes in LP was also significantly higher than that in EP (24.4 ± 9.4 vs. 20.8 ± 10.4, p = 0.035). The complication rate was significantly lower in LP (29/86 vs. 25/111, p = 0.048). The extended resection (ER) rate was significantly higher in LP (p = 0.023). The 7-year survival was comparable in EP and LP in both patients with T1N0 and T2N0 (p = 0.28 and p = 0.11, respectively). CONCLUSION: Perioperative outcomes, such as duration of surgery, number of dissected lymph nodes, complications, and ERs are favorable in patients who underwent surgeries after the first sleeve resection. The first sleeve lobectomy may be considered as the benchmark procedure for the proficiency level in RATS.

Long-Term Outcomes of Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy in the Prone versus Lateral Position: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have suggested that thoracoscopic esophagectomy (TE) in the prone position (TEP) may be more feasible than TE in the lateral position (TEL); however, few studies have compared long-term survival between the two procedures. We evaluated whether TEP is oncologically equivalent to TEL. METHODS: Surgical outcomes of TEs performed from January 2006 to December 2013 at our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Propensity score matching was used to control for confounding factors. RESULTS: TE was performed in 200 patients diagnosed with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; 78 patients were matched in two procedures. The mean thoracic operative time in TEL was shorter than in TEP (228.9 min vs. 299.1 min; p < 0.001); however, the mean thoracic blood loss in TEL was higher than in TEP (186.9 ml vs. 76.5 ml; p < 0.001). The mean number of thoracic lymph nodes harvested in TEL was lower than in TEP (23.5 vs. 26.9; p < 0.05), and the pulmonary complication rate in TEL was higher than in TEP (30.8% vs. 15.4%; p < 0.05). The 5-year overall survival rates in pathological stage I (81.2% vs. 81.6%; p = 0.82), stage II (65.3% vs. 80.9%; p = 0.21), stage III (26.7% vs. 24.2%; p = 0.86) and all stages (63.6% vs. 62.3%; p = 0.88), and the 5-year progression-free survival rates in pathological stage I (78.0% vs. 81.8%; p = 0.54), stage II (53.5% vs. 77.6%; p = 0.13), stage III (10.5% vs. 12.8%; p = 0.81) and all stages (53.6% vs. 57.9%; p = 0.50) were not significantly different between the two procedures. CONCLUSION: TEP and TEL provide equal oncological efficiency.

Prophylactic Cervical Lymph Node Dissection in Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer Increases Postoperative Complications and Does Not Improve Survival.

BACKGROUND: Esophagectomy with three-field lymph node dissection is common, but the effects of cervical lymph node dissection on overall survival in patients with thoracic esophageal cancer remain controversial. Recently, we performed thoracoscopic esophagectomy and superior mediastinum and paracervical esophageal lymph nodes could have been effectively dissected from the thoracic cavity. This study assessed the risks and benefits of prophylactic supraclavicular lymph node dissection in patients who underwent thoracoscopic esophagectomy. METHODS: This retrospective study included 294 patients who underwent thoracoscopic esophagectomy at Kobe University Hospital and Hyogo Cancer Center between April 2010 and December 2015. Patients in the two-field (paracervical esophageal lymph nodes were dissected from the thoracic cavity) and three-field lymph node dissection groups were matched using propensity score matching. We compared overall survival and the incidence of postoperative complications in the matched cohort and assessed the estimated efficacy of additional lymphadenectomy for supraclavicular lymph node recurrence in the entire cohort. RESULTS: In the matched cohort, overall survival was not significantly different between the two groups, but the incidence of recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy was significantly higher in the 3FL group than in the 2FL group. In the entire cohort, 162 patients underwent a two-field lymph node dissection; 11 experienced supraclavicular nodal recurrence. We performed additional supraclavicular lymph node dissection in three patients without systemic metastasis, all of whom are alive without any other recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic cervical lymph nodes dissection in thoracoscopic esophagectomy does not improve long-term survival but does increase the risk of postoperative complications.

[Indication and Results of 3-port Thoracoscopic Limited Resection for Lung Cancer].

The tumors with the size of 15 mm or less and less than 50 percent of solid component have been eligible for our radical surgical indication of 3-port thoracoscopic limited resection. The objective is to evaluate the indication. Between 2010 and 2015, we reviewed 206 segmentectomy and 87 partial resection. In those patients, non-radical limited resections included 129 segmentectomy and 29 partial resection. As for imaging findings, the maximum tumor diameter were 16.7 mm vs 10.8 mm and the consolidation/tumor (C/T) ratio were 0.54 vs 0.39. At a mean follow up of 48 months, 5-year overall survival (OS) were 91.4% vs 93.1%, and 5-year recurrent free survival (RFS) were 88.6% vs 93.1%. Overall recurrence(10 patients vs 6 patients) happened in the patients with non-radical limited resections for pure or part solid tumors, therefore it is necessary to consider an indication of limited resection for solid tumors carefully.

Using the Hand-Sewn Purse-String Stapled Anastomotic Technique for Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (MIILE) is increasingly being used in the treatment of middle or lower esophageal cancer. Hand-sewn purse-string stapled anastomosis is a classic approach in open esophagectomy. However, this procedure is technically difficult under thoracoscopy. The hardest part is delivering the anvil into the esophageal stump. Herein, we report an approach to performing this step under thoracoscopy. METHODS: A total of 257 consecutive patients who underwent MIILE between April 2013 and July 2017 were analyzed retrospectively. The operator hand sewed the purse string using silk thread under thoracoscopy, and the 25-mm circular stapler was passed through the anterior axillary line at the fourth intercostal space to finish the side-to-end gastroesophageal anastomosis. Patient demographics, intraoperative data, postoperative complications were evaluated. RESULTS: The mean operative time, thoracoscopy time, and anvil fixation time was 307.0 ± 34.3, 155.4 ± 21.5, and 7.1 ± 1.6 minute, respectively. The anastomotic leak and anastomotic stricture occurred in 6.6% (17 of 257) and 3.9% (10 of 257) of patients, respectively. There was no intraoperative death; one case was death of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) for conduit gastric leakage on the 21st postoperative day. CONCLUSION: Using the hand-sewn purse-string stapled anastomotic technique for MIILE is feasible and relatively safe in patients with middle or lower esophageal cancer.

Change from Hybrid to Fully Minimally Invasive and Robotic Esophagectomy is Possible without Compromises.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of esophageal carcinoma is increasing in the western world, and esophageal resection is the essential therapy. Several studies report advantages of minimally invasive esophagectomies (MIEs) versus conventional open procedures (OPs). The benefits of the use of fully MIE or robot-assisted MIE (RAMIE) compared with the hybrid approaches (laparoscopic gastric preparation and open transthoracic esophagectomy) remain unclear. METHODS: Between July 2015 and August 2017, the data of 75 patients with esophageal carcinoma were prospectively registered. Of the 75 patients, 25 treated with a hybrid MIE (hybrid), 25 with total MIE (MIE), and 25 with RAMIE. All patients were operated by the same specialized surgeon in our center with an identical anastomotic technique (circular stapler). RESULTS: The overall 30- and 90-day mortality rates were 0 and 1.33% (1/75), respectively. Total hospital stay (p = 0.262), intensive care unit stay (p = 0.079), number of resected lymph nodes (p = 0.863), and R status (p = 0.132) did not differ statistically between the groups. However, pneumonia and wound infections occurred significantly and more frequently in the hybrid group compared with the minimally invasive groups (MIE and RAMIE) (p = 0.046 and p = 0.003, respectively). CONCLUSION: Comparable results regarding morbidity and short-term outcome could be achieved in the MIE and RAMIE groups compared with the hybrid group. The data indicate that the learning curve is low in surgeons changing the technique form hybrid esophagectomy to fully MIE. Additionally, the total minimally invasive approaches seem to be associated with a low incidence of complications such as pneumonia and wound infections.

En Bloc Left Pulmonary Vein and Appendage Isolation in Thoracoscopic Surgery for Atrial Fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the safety and rhythm control effectiveness in en bloc isolation of the left pulmonary vein (PV) and appendage conducted as part of the thoracoscopic procedure for bilateral PV isolation, non-PV ablation, and appendage closure for atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: Procedural safety was evaluated by reviewing the surgical records. Rhythm control was examined in accordance with the Heart Rhythm Society guidelines at postoperative months 1, 3, 6, and 12, and yearly thereafter. The sinus rhythm rates at postoperative years 1 and 2 were compared with the corresponding data from our previous procedure without the en bloc technique. RESULTS: Starting in 2014, the en bloc technique was applied to 238 nonvalvular AF patients and successfully performed in all but 23 patients. The mean operation time was 88 minutes. There were no hospital deaths or major procedure-related complications. The mean follow-up period was 1.7 years. The sinus rhythm rates at postoperative years 1 and 2 were 85% and 80% in paroxysmal, 76% and 70% in persistent, and 67% and 61% in long-standing persistent AF, respectively, without antiarrhythmic drug use. Compared with the previous procedure (n = 324), sinus rhythm rates were higher in long-standing persistent AF (67% vs 50% at 1 year and 61% vs 40% at 2 years; p = 0.04). No patients suffered cardiogenic thromboembolisms without anticoagulation. CONCLUSIONS: Thoracoscopic en bloc left PV and appendage isolation was safely achieved in most patients. Using this technique may contribute to better rhythm control results than not using it in cases of long-standing persistent AF.

Thoracoscopic Left Atrial Appendage Clipping: A Multicenter Cohort Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to document the closure rate, safety, and stroke rate after thoracoscopic left atrial appendage (LAA) clipping. BACKGROUND: The LAA is the main source of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation, and thoracoscopic clipping may provide a durable and safe closure technique. METHODS: The investigators studied consecutive patients undergoing clipping as part of a thoracoscopic maze procedure in 4 referral centers (the Netherlands and the United States) from 2012 to 2016. Completeness of LAA closure was assessed by either computed tomography (n = 100) or transesophageal echocardiography (n = 122). The primary outcome was complete LAA closure (absence of residual LAA flow and pouch <10 mm). The secondary outcomes were 30-day complications; the composite of ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, or transient ischemic attack; and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: A total of 222 patients were included, with a mean age of 66 ± 9 years, and 68.5% were male. The mean CHA2DS2-VASc (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥75 years, diabetes mellitus, prior stroke or transient ischemic attack or thromboembolism, vascular disease, age 65 to 74 years, sex category [female]) score was 2.3 ± 1.0. Complete LAA closure was achieved in 95.0% of patients. There were no intraoperative or clip-related complications, and the overall 30-day freedom from any complication rate was 96.4%. The freedom from cerebrovascular events after surgery was 99.1% after median follow-up of 20 months (interquartile range: 14 to 25 months; 369 patient-years of follow-up), and overall survival was 98.6%. The observed rate of cerebrovascular events after LAA clipping was low (0.5 per 100 patient-years). CONCLUSIONS: LAA clipping during thoracoscopic ablation is a feasible and safe technique for closure of the LAA in patients with atrial fibrillation. The lower than expected rate of cerebrovascular events after deployment was likely multifactorial, including not only LAA closure, but also the effect of oral anticoagulation and rhythm control.

Safety and feasibility of robotic-assisted Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy.

Esophagectomy is associated with substantial morbidity. Robotic surgery allows complex resections to be performed with potential benefits over conventional techniques. We applied this technology to transthoracic esophagectomy to assess safety, feasibility, and reliability of this technology. A retrospective cohort study of all patients undergoing robotic-assisted Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy (RAIL) from 2009 to 2014 was conducted. Clinicopathologic factors and surgical outcomes were recorded and compared. All statistical tests were two-sided and a P-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. We identified 147 patients with an average age 66 ± 10 years. Neoadjuvant therapy was administered to 114 (77.6%) patients, and all patients underwent a R0 resection. The mean operating room (OR) time was 415 ± 84.6 minutes with a median estimated blood loss (EBL) of 150 (25-600) mL. Mean intensive care unit (ICU) stay was 2.00 ± 4.5 days, median length of hospitalization (LOH) was 9 (4-38) days, and readmissions within 90 days were low at 8 (5.5%). OR time decreased from 471 minutes to 389 minutes after 20 cases and a further decrease to mean of 346 minutes was observed after 120 cases. Complications occurred in 37 patients (25.2%). There were 4 anastomotic (2.7%) leaks. Thirty and 90-day mortality was 0.68% and 1.4%, respectively. This represents to our knowledge the largest series of robotic esophagectomies. RAIL is a safe surgical technique that provides an alternative to standard minimally invasive and open techniques. In our series, there was no increased risk of LOH, complications, or death and re-admission rates were low despite earlier discharge.

American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status facilitates risk stratification of elderly patients undergoing thoracoscopic lobectomy.

OBJECTIVES: Accurate risk assessments are particularly important for elderly patients being considered for lobectomy. Considering the positive effects of the thoracoscopic approach on postoperative outcomes, we sought to review the reliability of the established risk factors for elderly patients undergoing thoracoscopic lobectomy. METHODS: From January 2009 to March 2016, 441 patients in our institution underwent thoracoscopic lobectomy for early-stage lung cancer. Clinical outcomes were compared between elderly (>70 years, n = 176) and younger patients (n = 265). RESULTS: There was no significant difference in postoperative mortality and morbidity between elderly and younger patients. In the regression analyses restricted to elderly patients, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASA-PS) was the single strong predictor of postoperative morbidity. The odds of pulmonary and cardiopulmonary complications increased nearly 6- and 3-fold, respectively, in those with ASA-PS Grade 3 compared with patients with ASA-PS Grade <3. Additionally, male gender was found to have a possible causal effect of pulmonary complication in elderly patients. After confounder adjustment using propensity score matching, the generalized linear mixed model revealed more than an 8-fold increase in the odds of pulmonary complications in elderly men compared with elderly women. To check the robustness of the above-mentioned finding, inverse probability of treatment weighting was used as an alternative analysis indicating a weaker but still substantively significant effect of male gender, with an odds ratio >3. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that ASA-PS is a strong predictor of morbidity among elderly patients considered for thoracoscopic lobectomy. Compared with elderly women, elderly men are particularly prone to postoperative pulmonary complications.

Survival After Esophagectomy: A Propensity-Matched Study of Different Surgical Approaches.

BACKGROUND: Although open esophagectomy (OE) is considered the "gold standard" treatment for esophageal cancer, robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE), and laparoscopic/thoracoscopic minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) are becoming more common. This study aimed to compare short-term outcomes and overall survival of patients undergoing RAMIE, MIE, and OE. METHODS: The National Cancer Data Base was queried for patients who had OE, RAMIE, or MIE for esophageal cancer from 2010 to 2013. Three propensity-matched cohorts were generated, one for each surgical approach. Survival was examined in the unmatched and matched cohorts. RESULTS: We identified 9,217 patients who underwent RAMIE (581; 6.3%), MIE (2,379; 25.8%), or OE (6,257; 67.9%). In the unmatched cohort, 30-day mortality was higher after RAMIE. The RAMIE and MIE patients had more lymph nodes harvested than OE patients. Median survival was 48 months after RAMIE, 44 months after MIE, and 41 months after OE (p = 0.121). The propensity-matched groups contained 569 patients each. There was a trend toward higher 30-day mortality in the RAMIE group. The number of lymph nodes harvested was similar among the groups. There were no significant differences in survival, with a median survival of 48 months after RAMIE, 49 months after MIE, and 44 months after OE (p = 0.53). CONCLUSIONS: We were unable to find significant differences in long-term survival of patients with esophageal cancer undergoing RAMIE, OE, or MIE. Surgeon experience and expertise may be more important than surgical approach for esophageal cancer.

Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Provides Equivalent Survival to Open Esophagectomy: An Analysis of the National Cancer Database.

The use of minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is increasing despite limited evidence to support its efficacy. We compared overall survival and perioperative mortality for MIE vs open esophagectomy (OE). We queried the National Cancer Database for all patients having esophagectomy as the primary procedure for primary squamous cell cancer and adenocarcinoma from 2010 through 2012. A propensity score analysis was performed. Postoperative pathology and quality, as well as overall patient survival outcomes, were compared between OE and MIE. The use of MIE increased from 26.9% in 2010 to 36.3% in 2012 (P < 0.001). Of 3032 patients (2050 OE and 982 MIE) who were identified, propensity score matching (1:1) yielded 977 patients in each group. Mean lymph nodes examined were higher in the MIE group (16.3 vs 14.5, P < 0.001). However, final pathologic nodal stage was not significantly different in the matched sample. There was also no difference in pathologic upstaging or margin status between the groups. All other postoperative variables were equivalent, including an average length of stay of 14 days, unplanned readmission rate of 6.5%, and 30-day and 90-day mortality rates of 3% and 7%, respectively. There was no survival difference, with a median survival of 48.7 months for OE and 46.6 months for MIE (Kaplan-Meier analysis, P = 0.376). During the 3-year period analyzed, there were no significant differences in postoperative outcomes and quality metrics between OE and MIE. Although short-term outcomes are limited in the National Cancer Database, MIE appears to have equivalent oncological outcomes and survival when compared with the open approach.

Overall Survival Following Thoracoscopic vs Open Lobectomy for Early-stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-analysis.

A majority of observational studies on overall survival following thoracoscopic vs open lobectomy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer did not demonstrate a significant difference, whereas several meta-analyses on this topic showed a significant difference. The PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were queried for studies published in the English language. We searched for meta-analyses and original studies comparing overall survival between thoracoscopic and open lobectomy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer. Our meta-analysis, using random effect models and with a hazard ratio as a measure of effect, was performed on original studies. Publication bias was evaluated with funnel plots of precision and the Egger test. Seven meta-analyses on this topic were found and all of them have shown that thoracoscopic lobectomy is associated with significantly more favorable overall survival than open lobectomy, using odds ratio, risk ratio, or risk difference as measures of effect. Our meta-analysis of 11 observational studies demonstrated no significant difference in overall survival between thoracoscopic (n = 2386) and open lobectomy (n = 3494) for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (pooled hazard ratio: 0.91, 95% confidence interval: 0.76-1.09, P = 0.30). Neither funnel plots of precision nor the Egger test suggested a publication bias. Our meta-analysis, using a hazard ratio as a measure of effect for a time-to-event outcome, did not demonstrate a significant difference in overall survival between thoracoscopic and open lobectomy with the current dataset available in the literature, as opposed to previous meta-analyses.

Mortality and Respiratory Failure After Thoracoscopic Lung Biopsy for Interstitial Lung Disease.

BACKGROUND: Surgical lung biopsy contributes to establishing a specific diagnosis among many patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD). The risks of death and respiratory failure associated with elective thoracoscopic surgical lung biopsy, and patient characteristics associated with these outcomes, are not well understood. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent elective thoracoscopic lung biopsy for ILD between 2008 and 2014, according to The Society of Thoracic Surgeons database. The study determined the incidence of operative mortality and of postoperative respiratory failure. Multivariable models were used to identify risk factors for these adverse outcomes. RESULTS: Among 3,085 patients, 46 (1.5%) died before hospital discharge or within 30 days of thoracoscopic lung biopsy. Postoperative respiratory failure occurred in 90 (2.9%) patients. Significant risk factors for operative mortality among patients with ILD included a diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension, preoperative corticosteroid treatment, and low diffusion capacity. CONCLUSIONS: Elective thoracoscopic lung biopsy among patients with ILD is associated with a low risk of operative mortality and postoperative respiratory failure. Attention to the presence of pulmonary hypertension, preoperative corticosteroid treatment, and diffusion capacity may help inform risk stratification for thoracoscopic lung biopsy among patients with ILD.

Complications of Minimally Invasive Surgery in Children: A Prospective Morbidity and Mortality Analysis Using the Clavien-Dindo Classification.

There is a lack of information about evaluation of pediatric minimal access surgery complications; the Clavien-Dindo classification was never used for a large series of laparoscopic and thoracoscopic pediatric procedures. With a prospective Morbidity and Mortality database, all the minimal access surgical procedures carried out between 2012 and 2016 were included in this study. Statistical analyses were used to valuate modification of surgical techniques in to 2 periods (period 1: January 2012 to February 2014; period 2: February 2014 to February 2016). A total of 1374 minimal access procedures were performed on 1371 patients. The overall complication rate was 2.9%. No differences, in terms of complications, were observed between elective and emergency procedures (P=0.3). There was a significant difference between the complication rate of thoracoscopic surgery (P=0.027). These results provide the relevance of adequate recording system and standardized classification for analyses and reduction of complications for pediatric minimal access procedures.

Thoracoscopic surgery versus open surgery for lung metastases of colorectal cancer: a multi-institutional retrospective analysis using propensity score adjustment†.

OBJECTIVES: Thoracoscopic surgery for lung metastasectomy remains controversial. The study aimed at determining the efficacy of thoracoscopic surgery for lung metastasectomy. METHODS: This was a multi-institutional, retrospective study that included 1047 patients who underwent lung metastasectomy for colorectal cancer between 1999 and 2014. Prognostic factors of overall survival were compared between the thoracoscopic and open thoracotomy groups using the multivariate Cox proportional hazard model. The propensity score, calculated using the preoperative covariates, included the era of lung surgery as a covariate. A stepwise backward elimination method, with a probability level of 0.15, was used to select the most powerful sets of outcome predictors. The difference between the radiological tumour number and the resected tumour number (delta_num) was also evaluated. RESULTS: The c -statistics and the P -value of the Hosmer-Lemeshow Chi-square of the propensity score model were 0.7149 and 0.1579, respectively. After adjusting for the propensity score, the thoracoscopy group had a better survival rate than the open group (stratified log-rank test: P = 0.0353). After adjusting for the propensity score, the most powerful predictive model for overall survival was that which combined thoracoscopy [hazard ratio (HR): 0.468, 95% CI: 0.262-0.838, P = 0.011] and anatomical resection (HR: 1.49, 95% CI: 1.134-1.953, P = 0.004). Before adjusting for the propensity score, the delta_num was significantly greater in the open group than in the thoracoscopy group (thoracoscopy: 0.06, open: 0.33, P = 0.001); however, after adjustment, there was no difference in the delta_num (thoracoscopy: 0.04, open: 0.19, P = 0.114). CONCLUSIONS: Thoracoscopic metastasectomy showed better overall survival than the open approach in this analysis. The thoracoscopic approach may be an acceptable option for resection of pulmonary metastases in terms of tumour identification and survival outcome in the current era.

Short-term outcomes and one surgeon's learning curve for thoracoscopic esophagectomy performed with the patient in the prone position.

PURPOSE: Thoracoscopic esophagectomy with the patient in the prone position (TEP) is now being performed as minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. This study examines the short-term outcomes and the learning curve associated with TEP. METHODS: One surgeon ("Surgeon A") performed TEP on 100 consecutive patients assigned to three periods based on treatment order. Each group consisted of 33 or 34 patients. The outcomes of the three groups were compared to define the influence of surgeon expertise. RESULTS: Outcomes improved as Surgeon A gained experience in performing this operation, as evidenced by reduced thoracic operative times between periods 1 and 2, and then between periods 2 and 3 (p = 0.0033 and p = 0.0326, respectively); an increased number of retrieved chest nodes between periods 1 and 2 (p = 0.0070); and a decline in recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) palsy between periods 2 and 3 (p = 0.0450). Period 2 was the pivotal period for each learning curve. CONCLUSIONS: An individual surgeon's learning curve over the course of 100 TEP procedures had three outcomes: a shortened operative time, a higher number of retrieved chest nodes, and a decreased rate of RLN palsy. Approximately 30-60 cases were needed to reach a plateau in the TEP procedure and a reduction in the morbidity rate.

Outcomes of a Less-Invasive Approach for Proximal Aortic Operations.

BACKGROUND: Less-invasive techniques have previously been described for mitral and aortic valve operations; however, few studies have examined their benefit for aortic root and ascending aorta reconstruction. Using propensity matching, we compared outcomes of patients undergoing proximal aortic operations through a J incision compared with full sternotomy. METHODS: From January 1995 to January 2014, 8,533 patients underwent proximal aortic operations at Cleveland Clinic. The study population comprised 1,827 patients after those with prior cardiac operations, emergency procedures, endocarditis, or circulatory arrest were excluded; 568 (31%) underwent a J incision. A propensity score based on 57 variables was generated to account for differences in characteristics of full-sternotomy and J-incision patients, producing 483 matched patient pairs (85% of possible) for comparison of outcomes. RESULTS: Among propensity-matched patients, in-hospital mortality (0 [0%] J incision vs 2 [0.41%] full sternotomy; p = 0.2), renal failure (3 [0.62%] vs 6 [1.2%]; p = 0.3), stroke (3 [0.62%] vs 3 [0.62%; p > 0.9), reoperation for bleeding (17 [3.5%] vs 15 [3.1%]; p = 0.7), intraoperative blood products (60 [15%] vs 78 [19%]; p = 0.08), and postoperative transfusions (97 [20%] vs 103 [22%]; p = 0.6) were similar. Intensive care unit (median 24 vs 26 hours) and postoperative hospital stays (median 5.2 vs 6.0 days) were shorter (p < 0.0001) for the J incision, and operative and postoperative direct technical costs were 6% less. CONCLUSIONS: A J incision is a feasible technique for primary isolated elective proximal aortic operations, with a low risk of complications similar to those of full sternotomy, but with the advantages of shorter intensive care unit and hospital stays, lower costs, and better cosmesis.